RSS
 

NFL HIGHLIGHTS AND LOWLIGHTS: WEEK 4

02 Oct

 

While I continue to attempt to get over Monday night’s Cowboys game and how badly my beloved Cowboys played I will still do my best in covering this week’s highlights and lowlights. While, the Cowboys losing (albeit expectantly) is definitely the low point of last week’s NFL action, I would like to draw attention to the fact that my picks are on fire right now as between last week and this week I am now 9-1. Before jinxing myself any further here’s the review…

HIGHLIGHTS

1)      The Patriots re-claim the throne- If you are terribly concerned that the Patriots record is only 2-2  you don’t follow football. Their record in no way tells the truth about this team due to two suspect field goals costing them 1 4-0 record right now.  While I am still not sold on the Patriots come the post-season due to the fact that they have not claimed a Superbowl since 2004 despite the amount of hype they routinely receive, they are still firmly entrenched as the class of the regular season. If New England manages to fix its only significant deficiency which is its defensive problems in the secondary, it will once again be poised for the Superbowl. Whether or not they win it or not this time around is another matter.

2)      49ers pounding of the NY Jets- While everyone expected the Jets to decline after the loss of Derelle Revis, it was still somewhat shocking at just how quickly a team can nosedive (even for the Jets). Does this mean the Jets are that bad or are the 49ers just really good? The answer is a bit of both, but one thing is for certain the 49ers are for real. Although they lost an upset game to the Vikings last week, any quality team can suffer a loss during the course of a lengthy season. However, the mark of solid team is how they rebound following the loss. With Sunday’s skunking of the Jets and the dominant way the defense played defense for four quarters,  the 49ers emphatically proved that last week was not only a fluke, but that they are the class of the NFC. While I fully appreciate that the Falcons and Cardinals are undefeated, until these teams can soundly defeat a quality opponent and do so late in the season I am not sold.

3)      Atlanta Falcons comeback- While I might not be sold on either the Cardinals or the Falcons, the latter’s comeback late in the fourth quarter against the Panthers was pretty impressive. With under a minute to play with no timeouts and from deep in his own end zone, quarterback and team leader Matt “Matty Ice” Ryan threw a 60 yard pass to Roddy White. This amazing play against the apparently paper mache Carolina Panther defense, set the stage for a last second field goal which culminated moments later. If you are a Falcons fan you have to be thrilled about the outcome but you should bare two things in mind. First that the opponent was suspect to begin with, and if the Falcons are as good as they think they are, they should have walked all over this Carolina team despite the Cam Newton hype and sideshow. Second, by now regular season wins, especially against inferior opponents like the Panthers,  should not mean much for Falcon fans, when Matty Ice doesn’t meltdown come playoff time, then it will be good times in Atlanta.

LOWLIGHTS

  1. Detroit Lions Special Teams- Having two massive gaffes on special teams in a game is one thing, but when a team has two similar miscues just a week later like the Lions have,  it is time to start asking some hard questions and demanding some answers. Especially if these gargantuan errors are costing your team wins. If the Lions were supposed to make the “leap” from a good team to an elite team, there is no way they can allow these sorts of bush league miscues on special teams. Lions fans have been desperate for a reason to believe the hype, and believe that their perennially lowly Lions can make it deep in the playoffs. Unfortunately, Jim Schwartz has not only been able to control himself (i.e. handshake-gate), but he has thus far been unable to control or hold accountable the inexcusable actions of his players (see the many acts of Ndjshajsdhalksd Suh) or his coaches (see why special teams coach Danny Crossman still has a job). If residents of Detroit and the 8-mile were expecting to see something other than their same ol’ Lions, they would be wise not to hold their breath until the second coming of Barry Sanders or until Jim Schwartz gets his act together.
  2. Another dubious win for the Eagles- While folks in Philly were surely thrilled with the way they pulled out another last second victory, there are plenty of reasons not to take the victory or the team’s future prospects based on their current play seriously. While the Eagles did do some things well which they rarely do (like run the ball for example), they were  once again the beneficiaries of luck and improbable actions by their opponent late in the game. In this latest instance, the Eagles reaped the rewards of an Eli Manning red zone pick late, a dubious offensive pass interference call late and Tom Couglin’s baffling decision not to at least take a shot at the endzone (or at least the sideline) on 3rd and long at the end of the game. Couple these circumstances with the fact that the Giants just came up short on the field goal attempt, that had distance added to it due to dubious circumstance, and this win stinks to high hell. I’m not sure how a fanbase that pelts Santa Claus with snowballs has such good Karma, but I have a feeling things will change when they face the Steelers this week.
  3. Tony Romo’s latest debacle- As a Cowboys fan I really do not know how much more I can take. I had thought I had seen it all from Romo’s infamous fumble in Seattle, to the shocking playoff loss they suffered to the Giants when they were the number one seed in 2007, to the meltdown against the Vikings in the Playoffs two years ago, to the beat down they suffered at the hands of the Giants last year to keep them out of the playoffs. If you have read any of my picks column you will see that things have gotten so bad, that I know routinely advise people to bet against the Cowboys in any game in which they need a win or are favored (like Monday night for example). However, after last night’s performance I realize that it is time for the Tony Romo era to come to an in Dallas after this season barring some kind of miracle. While it was not all Tony’s fault as both his defense, o-line and receivers let him down once again, but to throw five picks in a game you are supposed to win at home, is beyond inexcusable. After DeMarcus Ware forced the Jay Cutler early in the third in Bears territory, the game was right there for the taking. However, in typical Romo fashion he made the boneheaded move at the worst possible time. And that is probably the essence of Romo’s career right there. By every measurable statistic, year in year out the numbers state that Romo is an elite quarterback. But what these numbers do not reveal is the gravity of the few mistakes he does make. These mistakes which usually take the form of interceptions, fumbles or missed throws always seem to come at the absolute worst possible time when Dallas needs a big win or even a big play. And while I have always defended Romo in the past, these critical mistakes cannot be tolerated anymore in Dallas, especially by its leader. When watching Kyle Orton’s final drive and the way he was moving the chains, it occurred to me that as a whole the Cowboys are a relatively young team. While Kyle Orton might not by the longterm solution at quarterback the Cowboys need, Tony Romo is due far too much money come the end of the season. Especially for the results he has yielded to date. If Romo’s money was spread around to the rest of the team, especially the offensive line, the Cowboys would be in a much better position going forward. Therefore, if it were up to me and I was running Jerryworld down there in Dallas, I would give Romo until the end of the season to prove his worth. If he same dismal outcome is precipitated it is time to close shop on the Romo project, rebuild with an efficient  but economical young quarterback and spend that savings on the offensive line and the safety positions in the defensive backfield. Romo my friend, the clock is definitely ticking.
Share
 
Comments Off

Posted in Uncategorized

 

NFL PICKS: WEEK 4

27 Sep

 

It will be tough to replicate last week’s picks, it will be really be hard to replicate another week without a miss. But with lots of juicy lines there is still a shot for another perfect weekend. Without further delay here are the picks (HOME TEAM IN CAPS)

AROUND THE LEAGUE

New York Giants (+1) over EAGLES

Well, as predicted here, it was only a matter of time before the Eagles’ luck ran out and they showed their true colours. And boy did they ever. While the first two games of the season for them went down to the wire, in last week’s contest the Cardinals owned the Eagles wire to wire. As for the Giants, they overcame both injuries and the odds (the gambling ones anyway) and handily took down the Panthers on the road. With talk already starting about the possibility of benching Vick things are as bad as they look in Philly. Be smart, take the Giants.

Saints (+9) over PACKERS

Yes, we all know they were robbed of a victory on Monday night, but even if they escaped that game with a win, one must really question what is going on with the Packers offense. Through 3 games this season I have not been impressed in the least with Green Bay’s offense and Aaron Rodgers looks like a shell of his former self. As for the Saints, while they are 0-3, they have still managed to put up points, so even if they lose this game I really cannot see how they lose it by more than 9.

BRONZE PICK

Chargers (+1) over CHIEFS

While the Chargers got torched last week, and the Chiefs escaped with an overtime victory over the Saints, do not expect either team’s luck to remain the same this week. Although the Chargers lost, they are still a fundamentally good team now will probably see some solid play out of Ryan Matthews (as he continues to get healthy) and Malcolm Floyd (now that he got paid). I see San Diego winning this game by a lot, so things look good if you are a Chargers fan (I am not a Chargers fan).

SILVER PICK

Bears (+3.5) over COWBOYS

Again, the Dallas Cowboys are my heart, but there is no way they win a game against a front 7 like the Bears have by 3.5 points. Dallas’ offensive line looks TERRIBLE this year, and the only reason they escaped last week with win against the Bucs because of the terrible play calling of Greg Shianno who for whatever reason he only starts the aggressive play calling when the other team has already won the game (On a side note I see this eventually costing him his job, especially if one of his own guys gets hurt). The Bears looked great against both Green Bay and the Rams, so I have no idea why they are the underdogs against a Dallas team with such an abysmal O-line. If Dallas can win this one, it will be the skin of their teeth. Do yourself a favour and take the points.

GOLD PICK

Patriots (-4) over the BILLS

Well like I said last week if New England were to somehow lose last week against the Ravens, they would be on an absolute tear this week and stomp all over whichever opponent is sad enough to play them. And while the Patriots were nice enough to cover the spread last week in the loss, this week they are poised to absolutely dismantle the Bills. If this spread were 10 I would still take it. Although the Patriots look a little down right now, they are 2 dubious field goals away from being 3-0 right now. BET THE HOUSE ON THE PATRIOTS!!

GOOD LUCK AND AGAIN, PLEASE GAMBLE RESPONSIBLY

Share
 
Comments Off

Posted in Uncategorized

 

NFL WEEK IN REVIEW: WEEK 3

26 Sep

After an insane weekend of blown ACLs, blowouts and blown calls, without further ado here are the highlights and low-lights…

HIGHLIGHTS

  1. Torrey Smith-Playing with an unimaginable heavy heart Torrey Smith turned into one of the most courageous performances in NFL history. For someone to lose their younger brother hours before game-time and then not just playing, but putting up the kind of numbers he did (127 yards and two touchdowns), is unimaginable. He was the spark that fuelled the Ravens all night and he made clutch play after clutch play all night. For what he did, what it meant to his team and the millions of people of around the World who resonated with his story , it might just be the single most inspirational performance in the history of sports.
  2. The Music City Miracle 2.0- The Lions-Titans was not only packed with wall-to-wall entertaining plays for 4 quarters and an overtime, but it was an absolute delight to watch Tennasse turn back the clock and pull from its bag of tricks the old Music City Miracle lateral on the kickoff return. Now while this play is still a sore spot for Bills fans, everyone else must have been amused to the device employed with success once more in Tennasse. Take solace Bills fans, at least this time it was clearly a lateral.
  3. The Raiders Comeback- I would like to clarify from the outset, that I am in no way shape or form a Raiders fan. I found the late Al Davis’ later career decisions to be incredibly offensive which included the always classy moves of routinely firing coaches in their first year and calling plays from the owner’s box. Moves like these have cast a dark light on the Raiders franchise and made them largely irrelevant for many seasons now. However, on Sunday the Raiders did something they haven’t done in a long while, played as a team, played with heart and overcame an incredibly strong performance by Ben Rothelisberger and came back to beat the heavily favoured Steelers. I thought that when Heyward-Bey was knocked out of the game on a non-call in the endzone, that the Raiders were done. Well they weren’t, and to my incredible surprise the Raiders came together and seemed to actually play for their fallen teammate. A Carson Palmer touchdown and two Janikoswki field goals later the Raiders had pull it out.
  4. New York Giants winning with injuries- After losing to the Cowboys at home and needing a miracle comeback to beat the Bucs, few had given the Giants a chance to win against Carolina (myself excluded). And why not, Cam Newton and the Panthers were just coming off a big win again the Saints, and the Giants, in addition to not playing particularly well to start the season, were all besieged with injuries at key positions. However, not only did the Giants prove the naysayers wrong, they absolutely STOMPED the Panthers in their own house. Say what you will about Eli Manning, but he has a way of bringing the best out of his teammates no matter who they are. Season after season he takes unknowns like Hakeem Nicks, Victor Cruz, Mario Manningham, Kevin Boss, (and now Martellus Bennett) and makes them into playmakers with eye popping numbers. The ability to do this is the hallmark of all the greats, and in this department Eli Manning is second to none.

LOWLIGHTS

  1. Derrelle Revis’ blown ACL- If you thought the hopes for success this season were on thin-ice before, the loss of all world corner Derrelle Revis sinks this team. Mark Sanchez is at best a mediocre quarterback, Tim Tebow is nothing more than a sideshow, the wide receiving corps is a joke, the once heralded running game is terrible (trust me I have Shonn Greene on my fantasy team), and the defense that was holding on by a thread, much like Revis’ ACL, just snapped with this injury. Why? Well in games Revis plays the defense is able to hold offenses completion percentages in the mid-fifties. Without him that number skyrockets into the 70s. There is no way this Jets squad gets anywhere allowing that. Period. Season over Jets fans, sorry.
  2. Tampa Bay Buccaneers play calling- When a team is down by two scores late in the fourth quarter what do they do? Do they continue to try and run the ball when it has not worked all game or do they turn to the passing game and try to win the game through the air? They throw right, everyone at every level of football knows this. However, for whatever reason the Bucs coaching staff absolute refused to adhere to basic common sense and insisted to ineffectually pound the ball on the ground even though they had no success with it against the staunch Cowboys defense. I know Greg Shianno has been criticized for his decision to blitz his players when the other team has already won the game (and rightfully so, play defense before the last minute of the game moron), but his decision to pursue the rungame despite the circumstances is equally if not more disturbing.
  3. All the Missed Hits- This weekend’s aforementioned missed call on the blow to the head to Heyward-Bey in the Raiders-Steelers game was by no means the only missed call of this weekend as Matt Shaub almost had his head taken off (and in fact lost part of his ear) in the Denver game. I didn’t think that things could get much worse after the hit Golden Tate laid on Sean Lee in the Dallas-Seattle game last week, but here we are. It truly is amazing that a league that generates billions of dollars and is probably valued at several trillion dollars, is willing to jeopardize its own players’ safety by allowing its players, the ones that are responsible for the money the league rakes in, to keep taking these vicious hits because they refuse to shell out a couple of bucks to get the best officials possible to be in charge of safety on the field. This situation would be comical if the NFL did not just come out and declare player safety as one of its most paramount objectives, since they did however, its just humiliatingly tragic.
  4. The end of the Seattle-Green Bay game- Who would have thought that a virtual non-name like Golden Tate would be in the headlines two weeks in a row, but this is the new look-replacement refs era of the NFL where anything is possible. A week after lucking out by getting away with a dirty cheap shot an Cowboys linebacker Shaun Lee, Golden Tate is back in the headlines in the most talked about NFL game of the season. At the end of the Seahawks-Packers game on Monday night, not only did Tate blatantly shove a Green Bay defender out of the way, an offensive pass interference call made by any competent person alive, but he was awarded a touchdown when Mr. Magoo now working as a replacement referee decided to award him a touchdown despite the fact that M.D. Jennings had already intercepted it. There is not much more I can say about this that has not already been said but I will say two things. First, Golden Tate wherever you are you need to go out and buy a lottery ticket, you are the most mediocre overachiever since Jeremy Lin, so try and cash in while you can. Second, by allowing these incompetent officials to keep incompetently officiating is only going to do damage to the NFL in the longrun. In the short term, maybe not because it is a horrible train wreck that everybody wants to see, but after a while people are going to get tired of looking at the chared wreckage  and the league is going to start losing money. The league will either lose dollars directly due to lost advertising, lost fan attendance or perhaps most obviously having to pay the real refs more due to the loss of leverage the league incurs due to public outcry or indirectly when current and former NFL players and their lawyers start to win law suits based on the NFL’s lack of safety. Either way the longer this goes the worse off the NFL will be.
Share
 
Comments Off

Posted in Uncategorized

 

2012 NFL PICKS: WEEK 3

20 Sep

While it seems that the entire NFL is backwards right now, what with the Patriots losing at home to Arizona, the Saints losing in back-to-back weeks,  a Peyton Manning led team getting blown out against an NFC opponent and the New York Jets imploding before our eyes (ok, maybe that last one is not so surprising), I am confident that this week the NFL will start to re-gain some order. Below are some of the juicy lines and picks I note for your amusement but remember THESE PICKS ARE FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY,

AROUND THE LEAGUE (HOME TEAM IN CAPS)…

Texans (-1) over BRONCOS

Although Peyton Manning looked great in week 1, in week 2 he looked just like you would expect a 36 year old quarterback coming off a myriad of neck surgeries and a year out of football, to look like. The good news for the Broncos is that they are playing at home with the mile high advantage (i.e. oxygen deprivation for anyone not acclimatized to the altitude). The bad news? The Texans are 2-0 and are looking dominate despite sub-par performances from Andre Johnson and Matt Shuab and if Peyton Manning plays anything like he did against the Falcons this one will be over early.

ARIZONA (+3.5) over Eagles

In back-to-back weeks it looked as though Philadelphia looked like it was going to lose to opponents who looked better than them for the majority of the game. That is until the last 5 minutes or so of each game, when Philadelphia suddenly woke up, got the benefit of some dubious calls and pulled out a win in the game’s final opponents. Can Philly do the same in Arizona or win handily? Well of course Arizona has the roster talent to compete against anyone, but it has been a long time since Philadelphia has lived up to the hype. Furthermore, although it is a total mystery how the Cardinals are 2-0 given their suspect roster, they have been playing with incredible grit, especially against the Patriots. Arizona is at home and the points are with them, it might be time for karma to give Philly one of the losses it deserves.

THE PICKS…

BRONZE PICK

Giants (+2.5) over CAROLINA

If you had told me in the preseason that that the World Champion Giants would be the underdogs against a team that went 6-10 last year, I would have called you crazy and lined up to place a bet if I had to. But looking at the first two games of the season for each team, and it is no surprise. The Giants got beaten badly by Dallas and were losing badly against Tampa Bay before coming out with the win late, while the Panthers having been playing their opponents really well despite their suspect roster. However, after a couple of weeks to get things right and the internal flame that must have been sparked after Tampa Bay’s antics at the end of last week’s game, the Giants seem poised to get back into winning form. I might shy away from this game only because of the injuries to the Giants, but if they don’t scare you and you have confidence in Andre Brown filling in for Ahmad Bradshaw and the rest of the Ginats receiving corps sans-Hakeem Nicks, have at this one.

SILVER PICK

Buccaneers (+9) over COWBOYS

If you know nothing about the NFL in the last 10 years, there are only two real truths you need to know. As a Cowboys fan I can sadly tell you that the first is that, whenever Dallas is expected to win a big game or is favour by a lot, have confidence in betting against the other team. Until I see otherwise, Dallas’ defense cannot win a ball game when it counts. Period. For the Cowboys to have gotten beaten so badly last week in Seattle and be favoured to win this much even at home is puzzling even for the most passionate Cowboys fan. Do yourself a favour and bet Bucs. And hey if you are a Cowboys fan and lose this bet, you can take solice in knowing that at least they won a game they were supposed to for a change.

GOLD PICK

Patriots (+3) over RAVENS

In the preceding pick I spoke about the only two truths you as a prospective NFL gambler need to know. If the Cowboys losing a game when it counts is one of them, the Patriots bouncing back from a loss and winning is the other. Over the last decade, except for the Peyton Manning led Colts, I would say no team has bounced back better after a loss then the New England Patriots. As such, for the Patriots to be given points is your cue to rush to wherever you need to get to and bet on them. I do not care if this game was played on Mars, it is easily one of the most secure wagers around. Of course, if the Patriots were to somehow lose, well there’s always next week to bet on the Patriots again.

GOOD LUCK AND PLEASE GAME RESPONSIBLY

Share
 
Comments Off

Posted in Uncategorized

 

2012 NFL PICKS: WEEK 2

15 Sep

Ok so a bit of a rough start to the season. The Patriots of course manhandled the Titans, but the other two picks were wrong. IN my defense however, I had no idea Miami would totally implode the way they did against Houston despite by in the game for so long and Peyton Manning’s neck actually making it through a whole game was a shocker. Oh any my sincere apologies for not making a make-up pick by posting that San Diego would trounce Oakland. San Diego for a s shaky as Rivers was last season, never losses in September, so my bad.

Anyway, I will vow to do better. Vow. I still made money on the weekend by betting big on the Patriots (and I hope you did too), but there is no excuse for going 1-2 in my predictions {who am I Bill Simmons (what was with him picking Seattle to make it to the Superbowl??!??) or Peter King?? j/k, actually well..}. This is an incredibly tough week in terms of making picks as I did not see any games that hugely jumped out at me, so if you bet I am warning you to bet small…

Anyway here are the picks..

BRONZE PICK

Kansas City +3 over the Bills

I can’t believe the Bills are favoured to win over anyone, especially after the beat down they took last week even if they are playing at home. I know KC has some holes and are playing on the road, but +3 are you serious? Not only that but Nelson is gone for the season, Jackson is gone for 3 weeks and Trent Edwards has something like 19 picks in ten games!! Again not a huge week to bet, but bet this one if you got the gambling itch.

SILVER PICK

New England -13.5 over Arizona

I am glad the experts in Vegas finally realized that the Patriots are back to vintage 2007 mode, but I am never a huge fan of going with the double digit point spread. The Patriots are super solid but what if Kolb actually has one good game in two years, what if whatever running back they are going with comes to play, what if Larry Fitzgerald has some magic late. You can bet that the Patriots will win this game, but -13.5 is tough. Well, not that tough given that the Cards look terrible, but again I am not a huge fan of the double digit point deficit when it comes to the spread. I am betting on the Pats regardless, and if you have no reservations about the spread then by all means bet on the Pats winning big.

GOLD PICK

New Orleans -1 over Carolina

Yes, I was just as shocked as you that the Saints lost week and even more shocked by RG3′s performance. However, the Saints can win this one. I know often when it goes, especially in the NFL, it goes quickly but is the Saints Drew Brees era really gone? Yes Sean Peyton is no longer on the sidelines this season, but I have faith that the Saints will bounce back from the heartbreaking loss last week and come to play this week. If they lose though, watch out Saints fans.

 

BONUS PICK

Balitmore +2.5 over Philly

To make up for my BS last week, I am offering up this bonus pick. Philly is probably down Maclin and Jackson for this one and Philly looked absolutely brutal against Cleveland last week. The Ravens however appear to be firing on all cylinders and already appear to be in midseason form. I don’t like that this game is in Philly, but its still juicy to get the points because I think Baltimore wins this game outright.

Good luck to all…

 

Share
 
Comments Off

Posted in Uncategorized

 

2012 NFL PICKS: WEEK 1

09 Sep

Ok, with less then 30 minutes to go before Sunday kickoff it occurs to me that I did not post my picks. Quickly here they are;

BRONZE:

Dolphins +13 over Texans: No idea why a Miami team that finished strong against a perpetually disappointing and injury prone Houston team is given 13 points, but take them. Miami is revamped this year and this game should be a lot closer.

SILVER:

Steelers +1 over Broncos: While the Broncos did beat the Steelers in the playoffs that was an absolute stunner. Pittsburgh is by far the better team even with Tebow out and the ghost of Peyton Manning in.

GOLD:

Patriots -4.5 over Titans: I have no idea how this line is not two touchdowns or more. The Patriots were just embarrassed and coming off a brutal loss (again) to the New York Giants in the Superbowl. They have been stewing for 8 months and have been waiting to take out their frustrations on the first team they played. Those saps are unfortunately the Tennesse Titans. I don’t say this very often, but when I do believe it: BET THE HOUSE!!!!!

GOOD LUCK TO ALL, AND PLEASE GAMBLE RESPONSIBLY (ONCE AGAIN THESE PICKS ARE INTENDED FOR ENTERTAINMENT PURPOSES ONLY!!!)

Share
 
Comments Off

Posted in Uncategorized

 

5 QUESTIONS HEADING INTO THE 2012 NFL SEASON

30 Aug

With the 2012 NFL season only a few days away, there are a ton of questions about the upcoming season about to be answered. Several prominent headlines have been dominating the NFL starved sports world since the Superbowl, and this piece looks at 5 of the biggest questions surrounding these hot topics.

Question 1: Will the Peyton Manning Experiment Succeed?

While he was known to throw caution to the wind on the Grid Iron, John Elway’s decisions this off-season as GM of the Broncos proves he is no different in his post-playing days. Not only did Elway jettison Denver American fan favorite Tim Tebow for pennies on the dollar, he did so in order to bring in the biggest question mark in the game right now, Peyton Manning. Given Tebow’s relegation to the quagmire that is the New York Jets and Peyton Manning’s proven reputation as being one of the best quarterbacks to ever play the game, the gamble could pay off. However, while most people (especially in the media) seem to love this move by Elway, I am not nearly as emphatic about it. If it turns out that the 36 year old Manning who just signed a five-year contract worth $96 million contract with the Broncos and who is a year removed from playing a single down in the NFL due to persistent neck problems has any sort of set-back, you can believe that all the people who were in favor of this high risk move will be singing quite a different tune come 2013.

Question 2: Who will have the better rookie campaign, Andrew Luck or Robert Griffen III?

Even if you know nothing about football, the fact that Andrew Luck was selected first overall naturally makes you think that Andrew Luck has the inside track in this two man race. However, once you look at the two of them, their skill set and their new environment, this two man race turns of Luck v. Griffen looks like Bolt v. Porky Pig. Of course we have all heard the hype about Andrew Luck, I have watched a few of his games and the man has that “it” factor you see in all the greats. For example, while its only the preseason, Luck has looked fantastic in terms of poise in the pocket, accuracy and decision making. And again, while anyone should be cautious when they are making reference to anything that happens in the preseason, if you watch Luck’s command of the game when he plays it leaves no doubt as to why Jim Isray did not hesitate to flush Peyton Manning down the toilet.

With regards to RG, while his skill set make him great on paper, not only he is in a terrible situation in Washington with a terrible owner and the erratic coaching of Mike Shannahan, but like many “mobile” quarterbacks before him, unless he stays in the pocket his athletic ability won’t be enough to avoid the big hits at the NFL level.  Even if Griffen beats the odds and has a great year, barring injury it should pale in comparison to Luck and Luck’s good fortune to play in a weak enough division where there is a very good chance he takes his team to the playoffs as a rookie.

Question 3: Will the Eagles finally live up to their roster?

After they drew comparisons to the Miami Heat for all of their high profile signings, the Eagles quickly found out that it probably  wasn’t the best compliment in 2011. This year however, the Miami Heat lived up to their hype and captured their title, will the Eagles be able to match this success now that they too have had a year to work out their kinks too? Without a doubt the Eagles on paper have the talent to compete at the highest level (especially if DeSean Jackson takes the pacifier out of his mouth and comes to playthis year), but can the Eagles, who have never won a title in the decade plus tenure of Andy Reid find a way to win on the field? It’s a tough question to answer definitively, but it seems that only Michael Vick’s ability to stay in games will determine this question in the affirmative.

However, should the Eagles not succeed again this year despite the talent on their roster, you can bet that any questions relating to Andy Reid’s future with the franchise will be a lot easier to answer.

Question 4: How long will it be before the Jets Self-Destruct?

This question of course is premised on the belief that the Jets have not self-destructed already. The agony of being a Jets fan  continues as the Rex Ryan led Jets went from being an underdog fan-favorite to a brassy all-hype squad in just a matter of a few years. Will this be the year the Jets get on track or will this mark the end of the line for Rex Ryan and/or Mike Tannebaum? In order to succeed the Jets will have to redevelop the run, step-up their once heralded defence, hope that one of the Wide Receivers they have left will step up, and most importantly, hope that the Mark Sanchez experiment works out. Of course for the latter to happen one must hope that the decision to bring in Tim Tebow, and the side-show that comes with it, will not be the definitive force that knocks this already constitutionally weak team off its rails for good.

After watching the Jets get progressively worse with stalled playoff appearances, a loud mouthed coach, a roster packed with headcases and a ton of empty promises, I would advise everyone who lives in the vicinity of East Rutherford, New Jersey to duck and cover around Week  8.

Question 5: Will this be the year Tony Romo is Finally able to shed his Loser Image?

When you think of Tony Romo, you think of a loser right? Given the way the mainstream media perpetually bashes this guy why would you think anything else?  However, if you actually watch the Dallas Cowboys and watch the man play, you would see that Tony Romo is actually a phenomenal quarterback, one who puts his team on his back and leaves it all on the field. His numbers support this as his lifetime QB rating of 96.9 is amongst the highest all-time, his lifetime TD-INT ratio is better than 2-1 and last year even while being lambasted by the media he put up over 4100 yards, 31 TDs (vs 10 INTs) and had a passer rating of 102.5 . So why all the hate for Romo? Well the answer seems to lie with the fact that as great as Romo is, things always seem to go great up until December, when the Romo-led Cowboys seem to collapse almost like clockwork . But again, if you actually watch Dallas play, you will notice that for every bonehead decision Romo makes, he usually puts up 20-25 good ones.  Not only that, but the Dallas defense has been absolutely brutal in big play situations for the last decade, especially in the secondary. As a Cowboys fan I have watched Terrance Newman and the rest of the paper mache defensive backs get burned badly on almost every make or break play for the last ten-years. Fortunately for the Cowboys and their fans, Newman is gone and some of the other fire-extinguisher ready DBs are also gone too, replaced by Brandon Carr and much heralded rookie Cornerback Morris Claiborne.

Only time will tell if Romo can ever get the monkey and the media off his back, but this season he has no more excuses. Dallas has a solid roster from top to bottom and Romo’s time is now. He’s got the numbers, so its on him to pick once and for all whether he wants to be remembered as the next Troy Aikman or stay the next Danny White.

Share
 
Comments Off

Posted in Uncategorized

 

IS IT OVER YET: TEN REASONS THE OLYMPICS NEEDS TO SHUT UP

21 Aug

Every four years (2 if you count Winter) the Olympics roll around and everyone the World over is supposed to be impressed by athletes the World over coming to one place and competing for two weeks. For those two weeks, the global focus (or at least the majority of it) seems to be transfixed on the international spectacle that is the Olympics, and the myriad of events that it encompasses. However, if you aren’t totally suckered in by all the pageantry and hoopla that is the Olympics, allow yourself a few minutes of reflection you will come to the realization that the Olympics are nothing more than an elaborate, tilted and expensive waste of time.

At least that’s what I think. I have voiced my opinions to some of my closest friends, and most of them usually share the conditioned gut-checked response, “what are you talking about, the Olympics are awesome.” However, after I lay out a couple of my points most of them seem to come around, and get a sense of what the Olympics are really about and how  both phoney and wasteful the event as whole really is.

This piece examines some of the reasons why the Olympics should not merit the esteem it does. It is my hope that after reading this piece that more people will come to share this view and I think that anyone who isn’t a total fanatic about the Olympics or a member of the IOC will agree with the points I have laid out.

Without further delay here are the points (I hope to keep them as short as possible but you never know):

LOST TELEVISION PROGRAMING: Even if you like the Olympics, unless you bleed them, you must get annoyed by the havoc it causes to your regular programming schedule. For whatever reason, although NBC is supposed to have the exclusive rights to the Olympics, the games somehow take over your t.v.  as they seem to be on every channel and on all day every day. Maybe this is just a Canadian thing because Canadian channels often pull signal from the States, but as a Canadian this is annoying as hell. And I know it’s the summer months and there is usually nothing much on T.V. anyway, but after being force-fed the same programming for two weeks it comes to a point where you would rather watch the nothing else. *

*Special shout out to AMC for not only running ‘Mob Week’ when the Olympics was running at full-steam, but also for the brand new and fantastic season of ‘Breaking Bad’ that covered three Sundays during the span of the Games.

DRUG SCANDALS: If you think baseball had a problem with performance enhancing drugs (PEDs), it is drop in the Ocean compared to the PED shinaniens that transpire with the Olympics. The Olympics have had problems with PEDs  for decades and nothing seems to change. In every Games we are forced to hear about this or that drug scandal with some whiny athlete either coping to cheating or pulling a Mark Landis, and emphatically denying it despite of course the real truth (seriously don’t pretend like you didn’t know what was going into your body and blame your trainer, the cold medicine or some brownies. Be a man and fess up). Not only does this annoy people during the Games, but it forces all of us to hear about the Olympics long after the 16 days they have been allotted ( you have two weeks of relevance every two years that’s it and even that is too much). Furthermore, perhaps the most atrocious aspect of cheating is that it robs the true clean athlete (if there even is one) their moment of glory on the World’s stage. That moment can never be recaptured, and the victim loses out on potentially several  lucrative endorsement deals and public attention while the fraud reaps the rewards until they are caught.

My solution, either you impose harsher drug test and harsher punishments (like life-time bans and fines to both athletes and countries), or you drop the flimsy prohibition on drugs that exists today and openly allow drugs at the Olympics. With all the openly super roided up athletes maybe then it would be something to see.

FAVOURS THE RICH: While it is not a surprise that countries who spend the most on facilities and on their athletes usually win the most medals, there is something nefarious about individuals from wealthy backgrounds being able to be in a much better position to both attend and win medals at the Olympics. While, I have come to expect the universal maxim that life favors the rich, it seems especially heinous at the Olympics. In the first place, because it appears that the majority of Olympic winners come from water sports, gynastistics and other sports that require incredible financing from a young age before an athlete is even ‘discovered’ (i.e. rich mommies and daddies), it seems that essence of the Olympics is tilted significantly towards the wealthy who have the time and money to give their kids the requisite lift needed for success.

TOO MANY BOGUS EVENTS: Even though no one will question the inclusion of basketball, boxing or track events like the 100m sprint, there currently exist many events at the Olympics which demand both suspicion and an explanation. From synchronized swimming, to BMX, to handball, to any of the horse events (dressage, eventing and jumping) the Olympics is covered wall-to-wall with suspect events that should not even be considered sports. Furthermore, equally appalling are the slight variations on an event which enable medals to be awarded for essentially the same activity (Hello Michael Phelps and Mark Spitz). Why there are so many dubious events is anyone’s guess, but to assume that their presence is meant to ensure that only the wealthy can partake in such time consuming and costly endeavours (the horse events for example), is by no means unreasonable.

MATCH FIXING: In addition to all the problems associated with PEDs, match-fixing is also rampant throughout the Olympics and has made the integrity of the games comical. Who can forget when Roy Jones Jr. absolutely destroyed his opponent Park SDi-Hun in his gold medal match in Seoul Korea? Even though his opponent (who since that Olympics went on to become a school teacher) the referee and everyone in the arena knew who won the match, the bogus result was allowed to stand. Not only that, but South Korea never known as a boxing power, had many other their boxers triumph and medal at the Olympics held in South Korea. Despite the obvious, protests by Jones and the American boxing team, and evidence pointing to corruption on the part of the boxing officials, the IOC kept the result intact.

The boxing at the South Korean Olympics might be the most famous example, but it is certainly not the only one, even in the sport of boxing (boxer Floyd Mayweather encountered a similar situation in the 1996 Atlanta Olympics). Almost every Olympics there is some kind of match fixing scandal wherein there is an accusation made (usually based on some evidence of bribery), an initial denial, a defense made by the IOC, an admission of guilt and the decision of the IOC, which often upholds the tainted result.  However, if the London Olympics and the atrocious behaviour of several of the badminton teams has proven anything it is that match-fixing need not be considered one-sided anymore, making the entire match-fixing situation that much more of a fiasco.

IS AN INCREDIBLE BURDEN ON LOCAL ECONOMIES: While the Olympics is rightly regarded as an incredible money-maker (especially for the IOC and media networks lucky enough to carry the Games), unfortunately it is not always so for the city or country hosting the games. For example, although there was much fanfare for the 1976 Montreal Olympics, the games ended up causing a 1.5 billion dollar debt to the Province of Quebec, an amount which was not paid off until 2006.  And while some defend the costs associated with hosting the games given the potential boost to the economy that transpires during the Games, given the increasingly high price-tag associated with a 2 week event (London clocked in at 14.8 billion dollars), there will come a point where most rationale nations will question the financial sense even signing up to host such a financially risky endeavour.

BURDEN ON LOCALS: Not only is the Olympics an incredible strain on the economy of a host nation, it is also a tremendous burden on locals. Imagine you live in an already congested and expensive city like Beijing and London, how horrible must it be for that period during the Olympics when your travel time increases, the streets become even more packed and the cost of everything skyrockets. It should also be noted that there is a good chance that your burdens will not be limited to two weeks either. Not only will prices take a while to come back down, and order restored to your city’s infrastructure, but if the Olympics are a flop, which is likely again because of the ballooning price tag of hosting, you can bet that as a resident your taxes will be increased in order for your city/province/country being foolish enough to host.

FORCE-FEEDS US ‘STARS’: Here’s a quick question, do you know the names of Linford Christie, Kerri Strug, Mark Spitz (before Phelps started winning swimming medals), Edwin Moses or Matthew Biondi? Do not worry I had not either, but for a time these were some of the most famous athletes in the World. Unfortunately, for these guys the shelf-life for Olympic athletes is incredibly short, especially if you are not winning and once they are out-of-sight, they are usually out of mind. And while sports fans would love nothing more than to focus on one of the big four professional sports after the Olympics have (mercifully) ended, Olympic athletes and their hype machines (agents, managers, publicists etc.) have gone to incredible lengths to ensure that they remain as relevant as possible in order to maximize their revenue streams for as long as possible. Sadly, the result is that that the public is subjected to a non-stop barrage of Olympic athletes for periods of time much longer than ever before. While I do not know the exact day I will no longer be able to recall the names of Ryan Locthe, Gaby Douglas, Michael Phelps or Lolo Jones*, I truly cannot wait for the day.

I know the Olympics have just ended but if I have to endure one more contrived story, uncharismatic public appearance or dim-witted comment by another Olympic athlete I am going to scream.

*Please for God’s sake read Jere Longman’s excellent piece on the Lolo Jones hype machine http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/05/sports/olympics/olympian-lolo-jones-draws-attention-to-beauty-not-achievement.html. Now if only someone would write one of these on Taylor Swift.

GLOBAL DISTRACTION: Although the actual Games themselves, the Olympics is seemingly never ending ordeal. As soon as one City holds its closing ceremony there goes the clock counting down to the next Games. And once the Summer and Winter Olympics were changed from the same year (resulting in a bonus Games for winter athletes to win medals in and a huge financial bonus for the IOC), it seems like the Olympics is always on the horizon, thus always drawing some kind of focus and attention.

Therefore, not only do countries have to spend millions of dollars on funding their athletes (and billions more if you are hosting the Games), but they are always forced to deviate their resources and attention from more pressing matters because the Olympics is always in play. Are you telling me countries like Greece and Spain could not use the extra attention and money it spends on the Games to fix their problems? And these are only First World nations, think about all the impoverished nations who could spend their resources addressing domestic problems instead of blowing it on the Olympics and then getting ripped off by the IMF when they need to borrow money (but that is another entry all together).

In sum, the Olympics are a global distraction of gargantuan proportions. If there were no problems in the World there would be no problem focusing time, money and energy on the Olympics. But in a World fraught with so many problems, especially now with economies crumbling left, right and center, maybe it is time to redirect our focus.

War, Poverty, Famine, Crumbling Economies, Natural Disasters, move over the Olympics are almost here!- Les Winnen, Chairman of the IOC

THE IOC A.K.A. THE GREAT EUROPEAN ARISTOCRACY:  The founder of the modern Olympic Games was a man by the name of Pierre de Frédy, Baron de Coubertin who founded the International Olympic Committee and came up with the idea for the Olympics in the late 1800s. Coubertin was nobleman born to a prominent aristocratic family and his idea was especially ingenious because it ensured him and a select group of people, a sort of millionaires boys’ club, the ability to rake in a ton of cash for themselves and make sure that the money only flowed to those they wanted to.

And what a gravy train it has been.

The IOC has been able to take in billions of dollars into its coffers over the years without any sort of legitimate accountability to anyone. And even with changing times and increased demand for equality the world over the IOC has been able to maintain its backwards and often racist traditions, while simultaneously making sure that that those in the inner circle get rich.

No matter the scale of the scandal, be it match-fixing or entire Olympic bid-rgging, the IOC makes its money. No matter the level of sexism, nepotism or racism (the South African experience was particularly appalling the IOC makes it money. No matter the financial burden on the host nation or the condition of the global economy, the IOC makes its money.

How does it do this? Well selection to the IOC is not made in an open and free process, candidates are preferentially selected from existing members. Furthermore, membership is essentially is for life meaning once you are in the millionaire’s billionaire’s club you are there for life (unless of course you are case out by superior members). In addition to closed selection, the IOC has also developed a full-proof way of making money, it shares no risk with host nations but takes a percentage of everything including the revenues which arise from selling preferential advertising sponsorships to companies and television rights. The IOC is therefore making money hand-over-fist and doing so in the most un-democratic and un-accountable way possible. It truly is the Global racket.

SUMMARY: I have provided you with ten reasons solid reasons why the Olympics is not only overhyped and annoying, but why its corrupt, financially destructive influence at present has no place in the World today. If the governments of every nation are striving for progressive change, accountability and the eradication of corruption, they need to turn their attention to the IOC and pressure them to enact substantial change in these same areas. Should they not be able to, well the Olympics has been boycotted before, and maybe one involving all the countries of the civilized World will get their attention.  It will serve them right, lord knows their global nuisance has demanded mine for far too long.

Share
 
Comments Off

Posted in Uncategorized

 

OK, OK, HOLLYWOOD HAS SOME HUMOUR

31 Jul

Last week, I posted an entry of what I considered to be the 10 least funny people in Hollywood. Unsruprisngly several people have confronted me (likely they are the same people who pay money to see the crappy works of said unfunny members of Hollywood) and called me everything from a hater to someone who does not appreciate humour.

I quickly countered by stating that I am in fact not a humor hater, and that I in fact love it very much. The point of my article was to implore Hollywood to return to times of yore, and stomp out the trash that passes for humor these days.

To further my non-hater I case, below I have not only compiled a list of the top ten people I actually considered funny, but the 15 or so movies I alluded to in my previous entry as being truly comic (sadly, the only movies that merit the standing in the last 30 years).

Once more I am not a hater (ok maybe I am a little), and here are your lists,

Enjoy…

TOP 15 COMEDIES (in no particular order)

1. Coming to America

2. Trading Places

3. Beverly Hills Cop (1-2)

4. The Hangover (Franchise)

5. Superbad (my girl LOVES this movie ;) )

6. Wedding Crashers

7. Dumb and Dumber

8. Borat, Cultural Stylings of whatever…

9. American Pie

10.Ghostbusters (Franchise..gotta love that Vigo)

11.Tommy Boy

12.Rush Hour

13.Bridesmaids

14.Office Space

15.Brewster’s Millions

16.Silver Streak*

*Richard Pryor Bonus

Top 10 Most Funny People in Hollywood (in some particular order)

1.Bill Hader- funniest man alive and amazingly underrated

2.Kristen Weig- funniest woman alive and only now getting the recognition she is due. I however was a fan from Day 1

3.Daniel Tosh- he might be misogynistic and racist, but he is still incredibly talented

4. Chris Rock- The man is ha-ha funny but, more than that he is incredibly insightful and the greatest living social commentator of our day. If he ever learns to translate his talent to the big screen there will be no stopping him

5. Eddie Murphy- Doesn’t have to do another damn thing and he will never fall out of the top 5

6. Ken Jeong- He has got brains, he is incredibly funny, and he created the funniest “character” in movie history what more could anyone ask for? Oh ya right a bigger wang. Sorry Ken

7. Dave Chappelle- Just because he lost his mind does not mean he is not funny. My friend Ram and I were discussing it and agreed that his perfect comeback would be in the inevitable Trading Places re-make playing Murphy’s Valentine part, with Ed Helms playing Dan Ackroyd’s immortal Winthorpe part

8. Louis C.K. -People love this guy and he is definitely ok, but to me he is the white and poorman’s version of Chris Rock

9. Jonah Hill- unlike Jack Black he actually succeed’s in the fat and funny department. Not only that but he even excels when he’s thin like he did in 21 Jump Street. Look at that range, move over Joe Pecsi

10. Seth Rogan -genuinely funny, but in his shotgun approach to movie making he has dropped some turds. However, steering clear of any more projects with Adam Sandler is probably enough of a career catalyst.

11.Tina Fey- I was never a huge fan of 30 Rock because it seemed like it a televised version of the Naked Gun crossed with  Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip (I was not a fan of either project), but Fey is funny and her Palin impression although excessive, is worth of submission to the National Library of Movie Preservation (or whatever that thing is called where they send really good entertainment projects).*

*My Girl Also Recommended She Appear on the List Bonus

Share
 
Comments Off

Posted in Uncategorized

 

Top Ten Least Funny People In Hollywood

17 Jul

 Looking for a light and humorous movie to watch this weekend, my girl and I started flipping through our catalogue of movies at home and one thing became increasingly apparent as we did, there are not a lot of funny movies out there. In truth, while we were impressed with the number of quality dramas there were in the 500 movies we have at home, of these 500 movies there were maybe only 10 solid comedies in the bunch and 8 of them we have seen pretty recently. Miraculously, we found a DVD that contained both Beverly Hills Cop 1 and 2 on it, and as soon as we hit play it looked like the weekend was saved.

I love Eddie Murphy and always have. From the time I was 8 years old and my parents and I watched Coming-To-America together I have remained pro-Murphy (ok maybe their decision to have me watch that at 8 was suspect but I think I turned out alright). Even in the dark days of the mid-nineties, and with the sporadic hit and misses of today I stayed true to the school of Murphy, because with the exception of Chris Rock and Richard Pryor, no one can make you think and make you bust a gut the way Murphy can.

While my wife was wary of a Murphy movie because she was born a little outside of Murphy’s prime (J), I had an ear-to-ear grin when that Beverly Hills Cop DVD emerged out of nowhere. However, when the movie commenced this strange sadness came over me and I couldn’t believe I was getting depressed. I knew I was not getting depressed because for some stupid reason like thinking I was starting to outgrow Murphy or had any doubt in his comedic genius even though its twenty years 23 years since I first became a fan, but rather it was related to my earlier search for decent comedy which turned into a prolonged effort even though we had over 500 movie titles to choose from. As I continued to think about it I was racking my brain to desperately come up with any other comedies that we were lacking at home and by the time Victor Maitland was blown away, I still could not. We had them all and there were only about 15. Fifteen movies in the entire contemporary age of cinema!! And even though my definition of the contemporary age of cinema is 1980 for comedies and 1970 for dramas, the comedy draught is still terrible given that its been 32 years and there are only maybe 15 comedies worth remembering. How can this be? Is it Eddie Murphy’s fault that he does not make 50 comedies a year? Doubtful. Is it Richard Pryor’s fault that his drug addiction ended his career prematurely? Maybe. Is it Chris Rock’s fault that while he is an amazing stand-up he has not translated that ability to the big-screen yet? Possibly. Or is it Hollywood’s fault for paying every two bit no talent-comedian who tells “half-jokes” , fortunes to make what seems like the same shitty ass movie over and over ? To quote inspector Todd, “You damn right it is.”

While Hollywood has rightfully taken heat in recent years for its terrible selection of movies which seem to be composed of nothing more than the regurgitation of old ideas (the reboot and the sequel), kid friendly visually appealing big budget larks (the Disney/Dreamworks Cartoon and the Comic Book Franchise), the ill-conceived original idea that failed miserably (the John Carter and the Battleship, which by the way I still contend was fashioned with the leftover CGI from the Transformers franchise), and of course the terrible comedy.

While there is the occasional original gem (usually attributable to one of Martin Scorsese, Christopher Nolan or James Cameron), by and large the world of movies stinks and has for some time. And sadly if you love to laugh like me, things are perhaps most bleak within the realm of the funny.

I could continue to cry about the state of comedies today or I could point hold my breath for Eddie Murphy to start making movies again (because even his worst movie is still better than anyone else’s best), but rather than harm myself, I will release my burning inner scorn and point my finger at those in Hollywood’s most responsible for the terrible state of comedy, the movie studios and the Hollywood big-wigs the people paid by the movie studios and the Hollywood big-wigs who  take millions and turn out lame ass uninspired effort after lame ass uninspired effort.

I’m pissed.

I’m choking on my own rage so I will try and keep the hate short.

Enjoy.

 

10. Paul Ruud

Ruud makes the list not because he is terribly unfunny, but because he isn’t really funny at all. In fact, couldn’t Rudd be replaced with about any white guy aged 18-45? What is so special about him that makes him privy to millions of dollars and the ability to keep getting cast as the lead in almost every other comedy? Oh right, Mavel Tov Mr. Rudd.

9. Jerry Seinfeld

Please do not get me wrong, I loved Seinfeld (the show). During the 90s there was no bigger Seinfeld fan then me and I still watch Seinfeld as it continues its amazing run on syndication. However, it has been years since Jerry Seinfeld did anything remotely close to the levels he attained in the mid-90s and even more troubling, given Larry David’s tremendous success on Curb Your Enthusiasm, it makes you wonder  whether or not it was David and not Seinfeld (the person) who was responsible for the success of Seinfeld (the show).

I will always root for Seinfeld, but unless he does something funny in the near future, unlike Billy Mumphries’ enthusiasm, mine will have to remain bridled.

8. Wayans Brothers

When it comes to a body of work, these guys have assembled probably the worst roster in the entertainment business of anyone not named the Toronto Raptors. The movies they star in and worse, the movies they are responsible for as producers, are the lowest forms of entertainment imaginable and come in one of two forms; trite and un-original or terrible spoof.  However, whatever form they come in you can always count on them tonot be funny.

Why aren’t the Wayans brothers higher on this list? Well they seem to have cooled on their penchant for making movies lately. So shhhhh….

7.  Dane Cook

When I heard that Dane Cook’s business manager had ripped off him off to the tune of about $12 million dollars I couldn’t help but feel a little sorry for the guy. What’s worse is that that the scum who ripped him off was his own half-brother, and what something like that happens within one’s own family it definitely blows (you expect the rest of the World to rip you off, but never expect it from your own family).

However, despite my empathy for Dane Cook , it quickly started to fade when I realized two things. The first was that this financial hit would only result in a oversaturation of Dane Cook products and appearances in a Nicholas Cage-esk desperate attempt to sign on to every project no matter how terrible in order to recoup the financial loss. The second is that Dane Cook is already terrible and so the thought of how much lower he could go in his desperate cash grab mode  both frightened and disgusted me to the very core.

If I were as terrible as Dane Cook instead of agreeing to sink to even lower depths with even worse humorless efforts, I would announce my retirement and hope that my tale of family deception was enough to launch a best-selling book that could hopefully be optioned into a blockbuster movie. The only problem with this plan is that Dane Cook would probably be the only person terrible enough to play Dane Cook.

6. Luke Wilson

While I briefly debated putting him on the list, given his entrenched presence in Hollywood and suspect performances which barely elicit a snicker I quickly wised up.

When it comes to humour there is certainly a difference between un-funny and not funny. The latter is someone who tries really hard to be funny and even though they cannot make anyone laugh, at least they are giving it their painful-to-watch best effort. The former however is a someone who does not try to be overly humorous, and in the Hollywood sense is just content on submitting an uninspired and ultimately non memorable performance. This sums up Luke Wilson to a tee as he (like Paul Rudd) is able to hang around Hollywood for years despite the fact that not only can 50 million guys do what he does, but no one ever really remembers anything he does. Even though I wasn’t a fan of ‘Old School’ Luke Wilson was the lead in this movie that was many acclaimed by many, but does anyone remember anything funny or notable he did in it? The answer is no, and what’s worse is that its probably his best movie.

Sad.

5. Ben Stiller

If Luke Wilson is un-funny, then Ben Stiller definitely is not funny. I do not know how many more award shows we are going to have let him ruin before we give him a pat on the back and say “there-there”, but his horrible efforts coupled with the crickets from the audience manage to make even me feel bad for a guy who probably takes in $10-15 million dollars a ( terrible) movie. Remember what I said about painful to watch, that is this guy to a tee, especially on live t.v.

4. Seth MacFarlane

If you are someone who knows me, you know that I will watch almost anything that’s on T.V. Even shows that stretch back to the 80s I am often right there watching them over and over (The Cosby Show, Golden Girls Matlock mark me down, I’m down). However, despite my love for the idiot box there is one show that is too idiotic even for me to watch (and thanks to my wife it isn’t Keeping Up With the Kardashians or the Bachlorette), and it is of course Seth MacFarlane’s Family Guy (and its terrible and even less amusing derivatives The Cleveland Show and American Dad). 

Despite the facts and my cynicism in general, I actually have a lot of faith in society and consider myself an optimist overall.  But the popularity of this show coupled with the MacFarlane’s ability to keep getting paid for churning out new and crappier crap (sorry that’s the only way I can describe it) that is lowest brand of desperate shock humor this side of Howard Stern is mind boggling. It has shaken my belief in everything.

I have faith though, if they could cancel Family Guy once (or two or three times), hopefully they can do so again. I very rarely make public appeals, but I desperately asking the critics to continue to blast the dregs that are Seth MacFarlane’s Family Guy brand and implore the masses to wise up and turn off this drivel.

3. Jack Black

Ok, we are now at the part of the list where I look at the biggest offenders and here is where I start to get mean.  I want good comedy back so call this tough love or an intervention or whatever. When Chris Farley tragically died in the mid-90s there was a void left in our hearts for the likable chubby funny man, who screams and falls down. In attempting to fill this void countless tubs have tried their best, but through the power of his network and Hollywood connections his various efforts it appears that Jack Black has temporarily taken the job. The only problem is that he forgot the likeable and funny part. I don’t know how exactly Jack Black has managed to escape the limitations of his own talent which should be confined to playing the unlikable 42nd lead (like he did in The Jackal), but for whatever reason be it his close association with Hollywood power-players or the genuine absence of funny people in Hollywood, Black has somehow thrust his fat gut into the spotlight and managed to stay there far longer than he should have.

Jack Black is not funny and his terrible repertoire of movies should provide more than enough evidence for anyone who questions my conclusions. In fact the only thing more repulsive than Jack Black’s comedic performances on screen  is Jack Black himself. If he doesn’t look like a fat midget with T-Rex arms and a face even his mamma couldn’t beat off with a broom handle then I don’t know anything. Told you I was going to be mean..I didn’t want to be but Hollywood you have left me with no choice.

2. Adam Sandler

Where to begin with Adam Sandler? Are there even enough words to describe my disdain for him? How does a guy whose Rotten Tomatoes movie average looks like the temperature in Antarctica (and on the Celsius scale mind you) keep getting green-lit by Hollywood studios?? And more importantly how is he paid 20 million a picture for the lame-ass turds he churns out???

While there are many questions one can ask when it comes him, the only one that matters is has Adam Sandler ever made me laugh? The answer is of course no. A grim, resentful, absolute no.  What does it say about not just Hollywood but the World when a no-talent moron like Sandler can use the same high pitched effeminate voice over and over in movies and still remain socially relevant for over 15 years??

While critics and true fans of not just comedy, but film, have done their part in blasting Sandler for each subsequently worse dud he puts out, Hollywood (and apparently the moronic executives at Sony Pictures http://entertainment.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/06/17/12266836-rock-of-ages-and-thats-my-boy-flop-at-the-box-office?lite) seems satisfied to keep following the same business model and giving his projects the go ahead. To their credit it appears to be quite the ingenious scam. Give Sandler 20 million, put another 10 million into the rest of the project and then put together an aggressive marketing campaign (that probably doubles the cost to make the movie) in order to saturate the market and annoyingly convince the masses to come check out the movie. What happens? Well much like the beautiful woman who succumbs to a geek’s relentless advances and says what the hell, the audiences finally say what the hell, go to see Sandler’s crap and probably feel worse than a hot chick who gives up the 15 minutes of pity sex.

In sum, Adam Sandler is the biggest scam ever perpetrate on the North American public and unless the moon landing is revealed to have taken place in the basement of CIA headquarters, will remain so. I dislike Sandler with every fibre of my being, but his occasional flicker of dramatic talent saves him from the number one spot on this list. That spot can and must be reserve for someone who is truly talentless.

1. Will Ferrell

Will Ferrell why are you so bad? You seem like a nice enough guy, one who I would have no problem with if you were my neighbor or went to school with. But boy how your movies suck. Your overly anxious but eager, slow-witted (but ultimately not funny) schtick is more tired than Christian Bale’s character in the Machinest and your “half-jokes”, jokes that aren’t quite funny but make you feel like you have to force a smile, have gotten so lame that it seems that members of your own “Frat Pack” seem not to want to get on screen with you.  Of all the people on this list your movies and your performances in them are the worst because with the exception of maybe Sandler, your entire delivery remains the same regardless of the movie you are in.

Think I am being too rough? Well its not just me, the World seems to have grown wise to Ferrell and his propensity for terrible movie making as he was recently ranked as Hollywood’s most overpaid star by Forbes (http://www.forbes.com/2010/11/04/hollywoods-most-overpaid-stars-2010-business-entertainment-most-overpaid-stars.html) and his recent movies, with the exception of the Mark Wahlberg co-headlined The Other Guys, have all tanked at the box-office.

Do the mounting criticisms and poorly performing efforts of lame, and dare I say boring, comedians like Sandler and Ferrell mean that perhaps this terrible and painfully unamusing age of comedy are coming to an end? I do not know for sure, because if these guys have been able to hang around like cockroaches despite the nuclear blasts they receive from critics, maybe they can withstanding anything. But I am certainly hoping. And you should too.

I close by saying that despite the vitriol I have hurled at the names on this list I am not a hater, at least not in general. But I and millions of movie goers like me have had enough. Not can I no longer turn a blind eye to talentless hacks who are getting paid millions to do the same lame ass thing over and over, but I am starving for something better. Although it might seem like it, we are not asking for much.

All we want as consumers of entertainment is that when it comes to comedy, just give us a product that has an interesting premise, some clever and engaging acting, a few quality jokes and a decent story that maybe has some social commentary that makes you think after the credits have rolled (think Trading Places, think Brewster’s Millions).

For the amount of we money drop at the box-office I don’t think this is asking too much.

Share
 
Comments Off

Posted in Uncategorized